The first challenge for Project One was to make the ‘case for change’. Our Programme Director interviewed the executive team and senior representatives from each of their business areas to gather data on the current state. Findings showed that there was a huge volume and many different types of Change Activity – with differing needs for skills, resources, approaches, levels of governance and types of reporting – depending on the nature and risk of the change. It was being delivered inefficiently with duplication across siloed teams, who were already overstretched and lacked the benefit of having change skills or best practices. It was at high risk with lack of visibility and governance and some high-profile failures.
The case for change was presented to the ExCo alongside the COO, predominantly focussing on the Risk impact. We used data to show the opportunity to reduce risks and improve efficiency by developing a more structured and robust cross-bank operating model. As a result, the ExCo requested that the Change Team lead an activity to establish a holistic view of Bank-wide change in order to help manage priorities, resources and risks to delivering Bank objectives.
We made pragmatic recommendations for handling the different types of Change through different ‘delivery models’ in order to achieve appropriate levels of delivery quality, oversight, control, risk mitigation and forward planning. The delivery of this required introduction of new capabilities captured in a new Change Target Operating Model (TOM), plus a phased roadmap for achieving it.