Order management comprised of a number of “channels” – orders supplied from internal warehouses, directly from the supplier to customer and items from the supplier but collated within the internal warehouse and delivered by their own logistics. Those orders supplied directly from supplier to customer (eDirect) gave an opportunity for a simpler introduction of the order management technology. It meant this core capability only needed to receive, process and pass on the order to the supplier, thereby proving the basic end to end capability without the complexity of integration to warehouse and logistics systems. The challenge for order management proved to not only be the volume and timing of orders but the vast volume and complexity of customer pricing arrangements, presenting a challenge to the design. Subsequent releases then addressed the remaining channels, enhancing order management alongside the delivery of the new Warehouse Management System.
The opportunity to deploy the new warehouse management solution as part of the opening of a new warehouse removed a significant risk to current operations, allowing for a slower introduction of service on this new technology, rather than needing to switch operations “Big Bang” as would be required in an operational warehouse. This could have been mitigated by moving key customers to be serviced from alternate depots, but this would put pressure on logistics and space. So, having a new warehouse and the fact that it was to replace an existing one gave significant opportunities to de-risk the move. Customers could be transitioned in groups from the old warehouse to the new and there was always an ability to fulfil from the old warehouse in the event of issues.
However, this still presented some operational challenges. The warehouses in the network could not hold all the required stock for the customers it serviced due to space constraints and so inter-depot transfers of stock were required. This movement of stock across the depot network became difficult as the old legacy systems were not integrated to the new Warehouse Management System and attempts to do this would introduce complexities across the wider legacy applications. This is where the additional space in the new larger warehouse was useful. The stock movement data was analysed, and an approach defined to hold a larger breadth of products in the new location for the customer it would service, thereby reducing the number of inter-depot movements.
The warehouse management solution was delivered in a number of releases with increasing complexity in line with how operations would ramp up. The first release being inbound capability as the warehouse will first need filling with stock. Shortly after a core outbound capability was delivered and then this was enhanced with more complex capabilities. This allowed us to use the application as early as possible and resolve any non-critical issues in a subsequent release, simplifying the fix and test cycles.